Close proximity to parks. Cable tv for Bears game.
Sites are tight but shaded. If dog area was fenced in would get extra star.
$75 per night with no working pool or hot tub? But I芒鈧劉m by all the parks... just average rv spot
Tim magoo
Posted Sep 15, 2019; Chicagoland
Proximity to the arches was fabulous. Location is key for us with a small motorcycle. WiFi worked great. No cable, water was intermittent, and pool was closed. It cost more than expected at $56.80.
Kris
Posted Aug 24, 2019; NC
If this campground hadn芒鈧劉t been so close to Arches NP it would have gotten 1 star. TINY Spaces were level on gravel but had to share electric and water with next space. Luckily we had extra long cord and hose to run under rig. Our spot didn芒鈧劉t have cable but should have for the $$$$. Pool and hot tub were closed although height of summer. Didn芒鈧劉t use bathhouse or laundry. Won芒鈧劉t return to this place if we have any other choice.
Janis
Posted Jul 02, 2019; Mississippi
This was not a completely bad campground. However it is so cramped and tight! We got in our site by swinging thru the site behind us and coming straight in. Once there it was ok. We spent the next day at the National Parks so not at the campground. The hard part was when we were ready to leave. Had to pull straight out and make a sharp curve thru the tent site area to get out. The reason for two stars is the power line was low which we did not spot and broke our antenna off. Office had a thousand excuses why it wasn't their fault. Very aggravating. Of course we would not use them again.
North to Alaska
Posted Jun 24, 2019; Alabama
Sites are very close together and they really pack em in clean restrooms and showers and laundry but they are much better parks in area WiFi poor no cable pool and hot tub closed we had whole group of tents 8 in RV spot so close we couldn芒鈧劉t walk to empty sewer I wasn芒鈧劉t told about pool and it was reason we picked this park pool is smallest I芒鈧劉v seen 10 people would be a crowd so my opinion of this park is go somewhere else
Sjk
Posted Jun 23, 2019; Magnolia
This park is very tight! But we had a nice stay. Their camp worker, James was so very helpful and such a nice young man. The park is on the north side of Moab, so you miss all the town traffic. Lots of tent campers and very quiet. The dog park would be very nice if it was fenced and away from the play ground. We would stay again but would prefer a larger site.
M Dumbach
Posted Sep 13, 2018; Missouri
Pros: Has shade trees and or pavilions, plenty of lots, free WiFi, showers.
Cons: tent lots are tight, Few to no hammock spots despite having trees, facilities are out dated and well used could use a heavy update. For example: shower drains broken and Hot water will change to cold when a toilet flushes.
Switchback
Posted Aug 17, 2018; Tennessee
Great site, shades, good facilities, great location, great staff, when raining it芒鈧劉s not muddy.
Yoav S
Posted Jul 14, 2018; California
The Campground itself is nice. It has big trees and is conveniently located minutes from Arches NP and Canyonlands. Site #67 was leveled, with table and bbq. Staff was pretty friendly.
This campground gets a 2 star review because they are more expensive than advertised (we paid $60 for a pull-through site). There is a 芒鈧揟FT芒鈧 in addition to the tax and we figure it芒鈧劉s a cc use charge of 10%+.
The bathroom / shower facility (the one that we used was closest to the registration office) was in terrible shape. There was one very small shower stall with a rag of a shower curtain. The faucets were rusted through, the shower head needs to be replaced. The same small room had 3 toilets. The ventilation was totally inadequate, the air in the bathroom reeked. For $60 I expect a minimum of cleanliness in the bathrooms. We did not use anything else on the campground.
Carlson
Posted Jun 12, 2018; Anchorage, AK
Looks beautiful
JollieBlonde
Posted May 18, 2018;